Calls to Scrap the CITB Intensify: What it Means for Contractors

The Growing Discontent Among Builders and Contractors

In recent days, the construction industry has been rife with discontent as contractors have increasingly voiced their outrage over the actions of the Construction Industry Training Board (CITB). This frustration peaked following the board's announcement of significant funding cuts that will soon take effect, sparking calls for the CITB to be dismantled entirely. Beena Nana, head of skills and training for the Finishes and Interiors Sector (FIS), highlighted that members feel betrayed, especially since they voted against these very changes just months earlier.

The CITB's Funding Cuts: What You Need to Know

On December 8, 2025, the CITB revealed it would scrap funding for essential short courses and level 7 qualifications. These cuts are rooted in financial constraints—the organization's reserves are dwindling, prompting them to justify these actions as essential for survival. While the CITB argues that the demand for its services has surged by 36% over the past four years, they have maintained the same levy rates, leading many to question the legitimacy and effectiveness of the board itself.

Contractors Challenge the Efficacy of CITB

Industry reactions have been overwhelmingly negative, reflecting deep-seated doubts about the board's ability to meet the needs of construction firms, especially small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Contractors have passionately criticized the CITB, with many likening it to a government quango that benefits its employees more than it supports those who are footing the bill through the training levy. Statements like, “Today’s funding cuts are another blow to small construction businesses already fighting to survive,” are becoming common as contractor sentiment turns sharply against the CITB.

Broader Implications for the Construction Industry

The impact of these cuts goes beyond immediate financial concerns. As highlighted in discussions among industry leaders, the withdrawal of support for level 7 qualifications could jeopardize site safety and overall project management capabilities. Rico Wojtulewicz from the National Federation of Builders emphasized that lowering the number of qualified managers could pose a significant risk, especially in a sector that thrives on safety and experience. Without robust management training, the threat of accidents and mismanagement grows, which could lead to long-term ramifications for project delivery and worker safety.

Are Alternatives to CITB Viable?

Part of the CITB's proposed solution includes shifting funding through Employer Networks, which would replace some direct funding routes for training. While this approach has been welcomed by some for its potential efficiency, critics argue it falls short of providing the specialized training support that many sectors require. The urgent need is not merely to reduce paperwork but to ensure adequate support for training that fosters actual skills, particularly in specialized areas of construction.

Industry Leaders Demand Action

As calls grow louder for the CITB's dissolution, industry leaders are not just lamenting the cuts; they are demanding accountability and action. Those at the forefront, like Beena Nana, argue for a complete overhaul of the training landscape that is better aligned with the current needs of the construction industry. This situation has become a rallying point for dissatisfied contractors who believe that retaining the CITB as it currently stands is detrimental to the future of construction in the UK.

Conclusion: Time for a New Approach?

The recent funding cuts by the CITB have drawn a line in the sand for the construction industry, sparking a widespread call for reform or complete dissolution of the board. Builders and contractors are increasingly unwilling to support an organization that they feel is failing to represent their interests and promote the growth of skilled labor within the sector. As the dialogue continues, the industry watches closely for changes that could reshape the future of training and qualifications in construction.